The Policy Analysis-Critical Theory Affair: Wildavsky and Habermas as Bedfellows?
- 1 May 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Public Policy
- Vol. 2 (2) , 145-164
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00005468
Abstract
Policy analysis may benefit from specific conceptual contributions derived from Jurgen Habermas's critical social theory. In particular, Aaron Wildavsky's emphasis on the policy analyst's fostering of social and political ‘interactions’ can be given concrete empirical content derived from the critical theorist's account of social and communicative action. In addition, the critical theorist's distinction between action and ‘learning’ extends and sharpens Wildavsky's and Lindblom's account of policy outcomes. Once obstacles to social and political learning are distinguished from ordinary constraints upon citizens' action, policy analysis research (as formulated by Wildavsky and Lindblom) can be more concretely specified and then understood also and essentially to involve fundamental normative judgments of the legitimacy of policy-fostered ‘interactions’.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Planning in the Face of PowerJournal of the American Planning Association, 1982
- Critical Reason and Political Power in Project Review Activity: Serving Freedom in Planning and Public AdministrationPolicy & Politics, 1982
- Incommensurability and judgmentTheory and Society, 1981
- Hannah Arendt and Critical Theory: A Critical ResponseThe Journal of Politics, 1981
- Critical Theory and Planning PracticeJournal of the American Planning Association, 1980
- Why More Political Theory?Telos, 1979
- Social Limits to GrowthPublished by Harvard University Press ,1976
- Power: A Radical ViewPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- If planning is everything, maybe it's nothingPolicy Sciences, 1973
- Participation and Democratic TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970