Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: A cross‐sectional study to evaluate the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi‐Dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales
- 2 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis Care & Research
- Vol. 62 (11) , 1559-1568
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20282
Abstract
Current patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have limitations, providing only a global perspective. This study constructed a questionnaire (the Bristol RA Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire [BRAF-MDQ]) from 45 preliminary questions derived from analysis of patient interviews and surveys and explored its structure for fatigue dimensions. The BRAF-MDQ and short BRAF numerical rating scales (NRS) and visual analog scales (VAS) for severity, effect, and ability to cope with fatigue were evaluated for validity. Two hundred twenty-nine RA patients with fatigue (VAS score ≥5 of 10) completed preliminary BRAF and comparator fatigue scales. Iterative analyses informed item removal or retention in the BRAF-MDQ and identification of subscales (using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and factor analysis to identify dimensions). The BRAF-MDQ and short scales were tested in relation to potentially associated variables for criterion and construct validity (Spearman's correlation). The 20-item BRAF-MDQ had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.932), criterion validity (correlation with other fatigue scales: r = 0.643-0.813), and construct validity (correlations with disability, mood, helplessness, and pain: r = 0.340-0.627). Factor analysis showed 4 distinct dimensions (physical fatigue, living with fatigue, cognition fatigue, and emotional fatigue), which correlated well with the RA Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue scale (r = 0.548-0.834). The BRAF VAS and NRS showed similar criterion and construct validity. The BRAF instruments include standardized NRS and VAS for fatigue severity, effect, and coping, are RA specific, and have evidence to support validity. The BRAF-MDQ uniquely measures 4 separate dimensions, which may facilitate development of individually-tailored fatigue management programs.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determination of the minimal clinically important difference for seven fatigue measures in rheumatoid arthritisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Fatigue as experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): A qualitative studyInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2008
- Development and psychometric testing of the Visual Analogue Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (VAS-IBS)BMC Gastroenterology, 2007
- More relevant, precise, and efficient items for assessment of physical function and disability: moving beyond the classic instrumentsAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2006
- The multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatiguePublished by Elsevier ,2000
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980