SOCIETAL BELIEFS IN TIMES OF INTRACTABLE CONFLICT: THE ISRAELI CASE
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Conflict Management
- Vol. 9 (1) , 22-50
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022803
Abstract
Intractable conflicts are characterized as protracted, irreconcilable, violent, of zero‐sum nature, total, and central. They are demanding, stressful, exhausting, and costly both in human and material terms. Societies involved in this type of conflict develop appropriate psychological conditions which enable them to cope successfully with the conflictual situation. The present paper proposes the following societal beliefs which are conducive to the development of these psychological conditions: beliefs about the justness of one's own goals, beliefs about security, beliefs of delegitimizing the opponent, beliefs of positive self‐image, beliefs about patriotism, beliefs about unity and beliefs about peace. These beliefs constitute a kind of ideology which supports the continuation of the conflict. The paper analyzes as an example one such intractable conflict, namely the one between Israel and Arabs, concentrating on the Israeli society. Specifically, it demonstrates the reflection of the discussed societal beliefs in the Israeli school textbooks. Finally, implications of the presented framework for peaceful conflict resolution are discussed.This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Anatomy of Political Beliefs: A Study of Their Centrality, Confidence, Contents, and Epistemic AuthorityJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1994
- The Arab—Israeli Conflict: Learning Conflict ResolutionJournal of Peace Research, 1994
- Intractable conflictsPeace Review, 1993
- The Evolution of Protracted Ethnic Conflict: Group Dominance and Political Underdevelopment in Northern Ireland and LebanonComparative Politics, 1991
- Value‐Guided Attributions: Maintaining the Moral Self‐Image and the Diabolical Enemy‐ImageJournal of Social Issues, 1989
- “IDENTIFICATION-WITH-THE-AGGRESSOR” OR THE “VICTIM COMPLEX ”? HOLOCAUST AND IDEOLOGY IN ISRAELI THEATER: GHETTO BY JOSHUA SOBOL1Modern Judaism: A Journal Of Jewish Ideas And Experience, 1989
- Victimization: Some Comments by an IsraeliPolitical Psychology, 1983
- Patriotism and WarEthics, 1981
- The Problem-Solving Workshop: A Social-Psychological Contribution to the Resolution of International ConflictsJournal of Peace Research, 1976
- The meaning of being a Jew in Israel: An analysis of ethnic identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970