Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases
- 2 March 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 357-375
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.01.009
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomyBMJ, 2004
- Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2001
- Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcomeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- The feasibility of vaginal hysterectomyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1996
- Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?The Lancet, 1995
- A classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1993
- The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Laparoscopic HysterectomyJournal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1989
- Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982