Learning and Varying Sequences of Ninth-Grade Mathematics Materials
- 1 March 1969
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 37 (3) , 61-66
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1969.11011132
Abstract
This experiment compared three sequence versions (logical, scrambled, and reverse frame orders) of the guided discovery program, Number Series, used by Gagné and Brown in their 1961 study. Sixteen ninth-grade algebra students in each of the three sequence groups plus a control group served as the subjects. While the logical order group was the only sequence group to perform significantly better than the controls on both a test of concepts and a problem solving test, none of the three sequence groups differed significantly from each other on posttest performance. Logical group students did, however, make significantly fewer program errors. They also tended to consider the program “interesting,” whereas scrambled and reverse order groups felt “neutral” about the program.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Sequence on Programmed InstructionAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1967
- Effects of logical versus random sequencing of items in an autoinstructional program under two conditions of covert response.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964
- Item scrambling in a self-instructional program.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963
- The acquisition of knowledge.Psychological Review, 1962
- A Comparison of Branching Methods for Programmed LearningThe Journal of Educational Research, 1962
- Scrambled versus ordered sequence in autoinstructional programs.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962
- Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961