Market Bureaucracy? Exploring the Contending Rationalities of Contemporary Administrative Regimes
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Labour and Industry
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-27
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.1996.10669150
Abstract
In the new ‘Post-Fordist’ public sector the previously accepted distinctions between the market and hierarchy are transformed by the advent of a new organisational form, the ‘market bureaucracy’. The article identifies four core characteristics of this new type and compares these to the organising principles of the three other administrative regimes found in contemporary public organisations. The article identifies unique patterns of selectivity as the central feature of the ‘market bureaucracy’ and argues that this is a system which is structured in direct response to problems of risk and taste. The ‘network bureaucracy’, on the other hand, provides an alternative model of restructure in which selectivity is based upon regional attributes and the guiding rationality of the administrative system is primarily cultural.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?Published by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Book ReviewsGovernance, 1995
- Post‐FordismPublished by Wiley ,1994
- The Market ExperiencePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- MANAGERIALISM STRIKES OUTAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 1990
- Competition Among Government BureausAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1979
- The visible handBusiness Horizons, 1978
- An Approach to a Theory of BureaucracyAmerican Sociological Review, 1943