Applying the results of clinical trials to patients to general practice: perceived problems, strengths, assumptions, and challenges for the future.
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Vol. 48 (429) , 1173-8
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs now provide the most robust external evidence about the effectiveness of patient care. There are, however, several assumptions made when applying the results of RCTs to individual patients. This paper aims to outline the perceived barriers against the use of RCTs in practice, while emphasizing the rationale and advantages underlying the approach. A critical discussion concerning the assumptions made when applying evidence from RCTs to individual patients will be presented, with a worked example derived from a patient with acute sinusitis. Finally, proposals concerning the effective implementation of evidence derived from RCTs in the context of individual patient care will be discussed.This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trialsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1995
- Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategiesJAMA, 1995
- Risks and benefits of treating mild hypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1995
- Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1993
- Developing a register of randomised controlled trials in primary care.BMJ, 1993
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.BMJ, 1991
- Discrepancy between Medical Decisions for Individual Patients and for GroupsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Antibiotics for cough and purulent sputum.BMJ, 1978