The Phylogenetic Position of the Rhizocephala: Are They Truly Barnacles?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Incorporation of the Rhizocephala in the Cirripedia, reflecting the traditional view that these parasites evolved from a setose feeding barnacle, has recently been challenged in favour of rhizocephalans being the sister group to all other Thecostraca or a scenario where they evolved from a free‐living, ‘precirripede’ ancestor. Adult morphology is useless in discussing the monophyly of the Cirripedia, since rhizocephalan adults are too reduced to furnish any phylogenetic evidence. But numerous, detailed similarities in nauplii and cyprids of the Thoracica, Acrothoracica and Rhizocephala as well as the ultrastructure of their sperm are synapomorphic relative to other Thecostraca and indicate that these three orders form a monophylum. There is evidence that the stylet in the rhizocephalan kentrogon is homologous to an element in the ancestral mouth field. If so, the Rhizocephala probably evolved before setose feeding was adopted, and constitute the sister group to the Acrothoracica and Thoracica. This conclusion is based on frail evidence so the term Cirripedia should be retained to comprise the Rhizocephala, Thoracica, and Acrothoracica. These three orders all possess remarkably similar cyprids, adapted to accomplish irreversible settlement by cement secretion and initiate metamorphosis, so their last common ancestor was most probably a permanently sessile organism.