Advice available on the Internet for people with coeliac disease: an evaluation of the quality of websites
- 11 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
- Vol. 17 (6) , 547-559
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2004.00561.x
Abstract
Background The Internet may be a useful resource for people with coeliac disease as a great deal of health‐related information is published online. However, not all of it is accurate. It has been suggested that accurate information is most likely found on transparent sites and kitemarks are awarded on this basis. This paper examines whether the Internet is a useful resource for people with coeliac disease and whether transparency criteria can be used in identifying accurate sites.Method An evaluation tool was developed using selected transparency criteria and clinical guidelines for accuracy. A total of 63 websites were evaluated.Results In the study, 66% of the websites scored less than 50% for accuracy. This was primarily because of incomplete information but 15.9% of sites contained inaccuracies. Over 50% of sites scored less than 50% for transparency. No correlation was found between sites that scored highly for accuracy and those that scored highly for transparency.Conclusion There are useful information available for people with coeliac disease but transparency criteria alone cannot be used to identify accurate sites.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adult coeliac patients do tolerate large amounts of oatsEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide WebJAMA, 2002
- Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destinationBMJ, 2002
- How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviewsBMJ, 2002
- Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topicsBMJ, 2002
- Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?BMJ, 1999
- Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the InternetJAMA, 1997
- Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer bewareJAMA, 1997
- Malignancy and survival in dermatitis herpetiformis: a comparison with coeliac disease.Gut, 1996
- An investigation of some implications of coeliac diseaseJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1992