The Two-Point Threshold
Open Access
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Vol. 9 (1) , 29-32
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00054
Abstract
The two-point threshold, or compass test, has long been used as a measure of tactile spatial resolution; however, since it was first developed, there have been problems associated with its use. Some of these problems include setting an appropriate criterion for responding “two,” extreme variability both within and between subjects, and the ability of subjects to discriminate two points from one at separations well below the two-point threshold. Recent neurophysiological results have clarified some of the neural mechanisms responsible for spatial resolution and demonstrated the inadequacy of the two-point threshold as a measure of spatial mechanisms. Several new methods may overcome these problems and provide a valid measure of spatial resolution and a reflection of neural mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surround Suppression in the Responses of Primate SA1 and RA Mechanoreceptive Afferents Mapped with a Probe ArrayJournal of Neurophysiology, 1999
- Spatial Acuity of the Body Surface over the Life SpanSomatosensory & Motor Research, 1996
- The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humansNeurology, 1994
- A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humansBrain, 1994
- The Spatial Characteristics of Tactile Form PerceptionPerception, 1983
- Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognitionJournal of Neurophysiology, 1981
- The Discrimination of Cutaneous Patterns below the Two-Point LimenThe American Journal of Psychology, 1918
- The perception of two points not the space-threshold.Psychological Review, 1895