Peer Review: Implications for Supervision
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in British Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Vol. 44 (1) , 21-23
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030802268104400109
Abstract
The process of peer review can be a valuable addition to the evaluation system of an occupational therapy department. Input from one's peers can provide a fresh outlook on issues that appear insurmountable to the individual therapist. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the process of peer review and to familiarize the reader with the significant variables that must be considered when the establishment of such a process is contemplated.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- PEER NOMINATIONS: A MODEL, LITERATURE CRITIQUE AND A PARADIGM FOR RESEARCHPersonnel Psychology, 1976
- Evaluation of a peer rating system for predicting subsequent promotion of senior military officers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976
- Practical Versus Impractical Peer ReviewMedical Care, 1972
- Peer Review of Medical CareMedical Care, 1972
- Estimating the Reliability of Peer RatingsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1969
- An industrial use of peer ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1964
- The consistency of ratings by peers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960
- Leadership, followership, and friendship: an analysis of peer nominations.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955
- Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1947