The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
- Vol. 24 (5-6) , 423-459
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680500316433
Abstract
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)—a perennial, warm-season (C4) species—evolved across North America into multiple, divergent populations. The resulting natural variation within the species presents considerable morphological diversity and a wide range of adaptation. The species was adopted as a crop—initially as a forage—only in the last 50 yr. Its potential uses have recently been expanded to include biofuels. Management of switchgrass for biofuels is informed by an understanding of the plant's biology. Successful establishment requires attention to seed dormancy and weed control as well as proper depth and date of planting. The plant's growth rate is closely tied to temperature, but timing of reproductive development is linked to photoperiod. Accordingly, the period of vegetative growth can be extended by planting lower-latitude cultivars at higher latitudes. This strategy may provide a yield advantage, but cold tolerance can become limiting. Switchgrass is thrifty in its use of applied N; it appears able to obtain N from sources that other crops cannot tap. The N removed in harvested biomass is often greater than the amount of N applied. In areas with sufficient rainfall, sustainable yields of ∼15 Mg ha−1 yr−1 may be achievable by applying ∼50 kg N ha−1 yr−1. Harvesting biomass once per season—after plants have senesced and translocated N into perennial tissues—appears to allow plants to maintain an internal N reserve. Two harvests yr−1 may increase yields in some cultivars, but a single annual harvest maximizes yields in many cases. If two harvests are taken, more N must be applied to compensate for the N removed in the midseason harvest. Taking more than two harvests yr−1 often adversely affects long-term productivity and persistence. Switchgrass has potential as a renewable fuel source, but such use will likely require large infrastructural changes; and, even at maximum output, such systems could not provide the energy currently being derived from fossil fuels.Keywords
This publication has 291 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studiesMycorrhiza, 2003
- Response of nine forage grasses to saline irrigation and its schedules in a semi-arid climate of north-west IndiaJournal of Arid Environments, 2003
- Field response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and drought stressMycorrhiza, 2003
- An evaluation of biomass yield stability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivarsEnergy Conversion and Management, 2003
- Influence of a Bacillus sp. on physiological activities of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and on plant responses to PEG-induced drought stressMycorrhiza, 2003
- The yield and composition of switchgrass and coastal panic grass grown as a biofuel in Southern EnglandBioresource Technology, 2002
- Switchgrass production and establishment in the Southern Italy climatic conditionsEnergy Conversion and Management, 2001
- Evaluating the “added nitrogen interaction”; effect in forage grassesCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1995
- Evaluation of switchgrass entries for acid soil toleranceCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1992
- Quantitative effects of soil depth and soil and fertilizer nitrogen on nitrogen uptake by tall fescue and switchgrassCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1991