Wildlife recovery: is benefit-cost analysis appropriate?
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Management
- Vol. 33 (4) , 327-334
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4797(05)80021-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the contingent valuation method: A psychological perspectiveJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989
- Rational Roots of “Irrational” Behavior: New Theories of Economic Decision-MakingNortheastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1989
- Rational Roots of “Irrational” Behavior: DiscussionNortheastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1989
- Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane ResourceAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- Broadening the Concept and Measurement of Existence ValueNortheastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1988
- Some Problems with Environmental EconomicsEnvironmental Ethics, 1988
- Expanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed SolutionsLand Economics, 1987
- Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered speciesWater Resources Research, 1987
- A model for valuing endangered speciesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1984
- Benefit Evaluation of Increments to Existing Systems of Public FacilitiesLand Economics, 1983