Sublingual buprenorphine as postoperative analgesic: a double‐blind comparison with pethidine
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 34 (1) , 68-71
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03044.x
Abstract
Buprenorphine and pethidine as postoperative analgesics were compared in 96 women having gynaecological operations by lower laparotomy. A fixed dose of the respective drug was given in a double-blind and double-dummy manner, initially intramuscularly and thereafter by sublingual buprenorphine (0.4 mg) or intramuscular pethidine (75 mg) at the request of the patient during the first 24 h postoperatively. Patients receiving buprenorphine had longer dose intervals and thus needed fewer doses. The analgesic effect, as assessed by a visual analog scale, was similar with both drugs. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding respiratory depression and nausea. It appears that sublingual buprenorphine is as effective and safe as intramuscular pethidine in the postoperative period.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Buprenorphine antagonism of ventilatory depression following fentanyl anaesthesiaActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1988
- Regular interval preventive pain relief compared with on demand treatment after hysterectomyPain, 1985
- Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: clinical observations and preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1981
- Relief of pain after surgery.Anaesthesia, 1979
- Analgesic effects of sublingual buprenorphineAnaesthesia, 1979