CO2 Concentration Limits, The Costs and Benefits of Control, and The Potential for International Agreement
Preprint
- 1 January 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In this paper, we use the two region CETA-M model to explore some related issues raised by the current interest in CO2 concentration targets as a possible climate change policy objective. First, we identify possible cost and benefit assumptions that would make particular concentration ceilings optimal. Next, we explore the acceptability to both regions of various burden sharing agreements, given particular cost and benefit assumptions. Lastly, we inquire whether the control effort and burden sharing rules may reasonably be negotiated independently.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- On stabilizing CO2 concentrations — cost-effective emission reduction strategiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- International CO2 emissions targets and timetables: An analysis of the AOSIS proposalEnvironmental Modeling & Assessment, 1996
- Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrationsNature, 1996
- Who Should Abate Carbon Emissions? An International ViewpointPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1993
- CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory AssessmentThe Energy Journal, 1992
- To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of The Greenhouse EffectThe Economic Journal, 1991