The difficulties in constructing a common denominator for peer review in general practice.
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- Vol. 36 (284) , 106-10
Abstract
A helpful analysis of clinical events in general practice would be to show a doctor how his opinion compares with the use of the same opinion by other doctors. For such a comparison a common denominator, which is a measure of clinical opportunity, is required. The population of patients cared for by a doctor can be used for this purpose and this paper describes a method which uses a computer to calculate the share of a known practice population that each doctor has cared for. The computer produces details of consultations, set out in square tables, of those registered with each doctor and those seen by each doctor.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients who usually consult the trainee in general practice.BMJ, 1984
- Do patients who move to a new town consult their doctor more often?BMJ, 1983
- Laboratory and radiological investigations in general practice. I-Type requested and rate of use.BMJ, 1983
- Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New England, England, and NorwayNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Do general practitioners have different "referral thresholds"?BMJ, 1981
- Consultation patterns in a general practice.1976
- Approaches to the denominator problem in primary care research.1976
- Symptom interpretation in general practice.1972