Subordinate Views in Supervisory Conflict Situations: Peering into the Subcultural Chasm
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 45 (11) , 1141-1167
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204501102
Abstract
Workplace conflict has traditionally been approached with legalistic, problemsolving, and power-oriented models. Most dominant organization cultures embody a combination of these models' assumptions. Based on 100 case studies from the United States, a bottom-up model reflecting the beliefs prevailing in subordinate subcultures is inductively developed via a two-stage content analysis. The key assumptions of all four models are contrasted along six cultural dimensions: namely, the nature of relationships, truth/reality, analytic determinations, evidence, time, and the consequences of grieving. The processes of nicknaming and story telling through which subcultural meanings are commonly constructed also receive close scrutiny.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The practical view of employee rightsEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1991
- History as a Mode of Inquiry in Organizational Life: A Role for Human CosmogonyHuman Relations, 1991
- ORGANIZING PROCESSESJournal of Management Studies, 1990
- The responsibilities of a semistructured interviewerEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1990
- Two Sides to Every Story: An Ethnohistorical Approach to Organizational PartnershipsCity & Society, 1988
- Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosisOrganizational Dynamics, 1983
- The Uniqueness Paradox in Organizational StoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- The Ethnographic Paradigm(s)Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979
- Who gets power — and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of powerOrganizational Dynamics, 1977
- Organizational Conflict: Concepts and ModelsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1967