Does the order of second-line treatment in rheumatoid arthritis matter?
- 9 January 1982
- Vol. 284 (6309) , 79-81
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.284.6309.79
Abstract
In a prospective study 88 patients, with rheumatoid arthritis who had stopped taking gold, penicillamine, or levamisole were randomly allocated to one of the alternative drugs and followed up for a minimum of one year. Concurrent studies of the effects of gold, penicillamine, and levamisole prescribed in 123 patients as the first second-line drug were used for comparison. No difference in toxicity or efficacy between primary and secondary use of gold or penicillamine was identified. Variation in the toxicity of levamisole could in part be accounted for by changes in the dose regimen over the four years of study. The length of the treatment-free interval between drugs did not influence subsequent development of toxicity. These results suggest that an adverse reaction to one of the three second-line drugs studied should not prejudice the selection of another.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse reactions to D-penicillamine after fold toxicity.BMJ, 1980
- HLA-DR Antigens and Toxic Reaction to Sodium Aurothiomalate and D-Penicillamine in Patients with Rheumatoid ArthritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Adverse reactions to D-penicillamine after gold toxicity.BMJ, 1980
- TREATMENT COMPLICATIONS OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS WITH GOLD, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE, D-PENICILLAMINE, AND LEVAMISOLE1980
- Is penicillamine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis influenced by previous treatment with gold?BMJ, 1978
- Toxicity of D-penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1978
- D‐penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977
- Chrysotherapy.1976
- Gold Salts in the Treatment of Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1974
- Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.Economica, 1957