Uses and abuses of analysis of covariance in clinical trials
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 6 (1) , 12-24
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(85)90093-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Azathioprine versus d‐penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with goldArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984
- Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1983
- Low‐Dose D‐Penicillamine Therapy in Rheumatoid ArthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1983
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Statistical adjustments when comparing preexisting groups.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Analysis of Covariance: A Delicate InstrumentAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1969
- Errors of Measurement in StatisticsTechnometrics, 1968
- A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- A Comparison of the Precision of Three Experimental Designs Employing a Concomitant VariablePsychometrika, 1958
- THE USE OF A CONCOMITANT VARIABLE IN SELECTING AN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNBiometrika, 1957