TheKnightSugar Decision of 1895 and The Modernization of American Corporation Law, 1869–1903
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Business History Review
- Vol. 53 (3) , 304-342
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3114089
Abstract
No conviction has been more a part of the standard interpretation of American history in the twentieth century than the belief that the U.S. Supreme Court, in a series of late-nineteenth-century decisions bearing on government-business relations, reflected the conservative reaction that seemed to mark the depression of the 1890s. But Professor McCurdy demonstrates that in its 1895 decision in the case ofUnited States v. E. C. Knight Company, which drew a distinction between manufacturing and trade in defining interstate commerce, the Court was not trying to shield a vast, monopolistic aggregation of wealth (Henry O. Havemeyer's “Sugar Trust”) from the will of the people that it be broken up under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The decision, in fact, was not the beginning of a conservative reaction, but the last effort in a thirty-year attempt to maintain a role for state jurisdiction over the behavior of chartered enterprises.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- American Law and the Marketing Structure of the Large Corporation, 1875–1890The Journal of Economic History, 1978
- Federalism and the American Economic Order, 1789-1910Law & Society Review, 1975
- The Knight Case RevisitedThe Historian, 1973
- Monopoly in Economics and LawSouthern Economic Journal, 1960
- Statutory Developments in Business Corporation Law, 1886-1936Harvard Law Review, 1936
- Visitatorial Jurisdiction over Corporations in EquityHarvard Law Review, 1936
- Economic Influences Upon the Corporation Laws of New JerseyJournal of Political Economy, 1930
- New Jersey and the Great CorporationsHarvard Law Review, 1899
- "Monopoly" under the National Anti-Trust ActHarvard Law Review, 1894
- "Trusts" IHarvard Law Review, 1887