Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock*
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 36 (5) , 1404-1411
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31816f7cf7
Abstract
Objective: To assess the outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiogenic shock. Design, Setting, and Patients: Refractory cardiogenic shock is almost always lethal without emergency circulatory support, e.g., ECMO. ECMO-associated morbidity and mortality plead for identification of early predictors of its failure, and detailed analyses of short- and long-term outcomes to refine patient selection and improve results. Outcomes of 81 patients given ECMO support for medical (n = 55), postcardiotomy (n = 16), or posttransplantation (n = 10) cardiogenic shock were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Thirty-four (42%) patients survived to hospital discharge; 57% suffered ≥1 major ECMO-related complications. Independent predictors of intensive care unit death were: device insertion under cardiac massage (odds ratio [OR] = 20.68), 24 hr urine output <500 mL (OR = 6.52), prothrombin activity <50% (OR = 3.93), and female sex (OR = 3.89); myocarditides were associated with better outcomes (OR = .13). Sequelae and health-related quality-of-life were evaluated for 28 long-term survivors (median follow-up, 11 months), whose mean Short-Form 36 scores were significantly lower than matched healthy controls for physical role, general health, and social functioning, but higher than those reported for patients on chronic hemodialysis, with advanced heart failure, or after recovery from acute respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusions: ECMO support can rescue 40% of otherwise fatal cardiogenic shock patients but its initiation under cardiac massage or after renal or hepatic failure carried higher risks of intensive care unit death, while fulminant myocarditis had a better prognosis. Despite satisfactory mental health and vitality, long-term survivors' persistent physical and social problems might benefit from tailored medical or psychosocial interventions.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Extracorporeal Life Support Contraindicated in Elderly Patients?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Analysis of the outcome for patients experiencing myocardial infarction and cardiopulmonary resuscitation refractory to conventional therapies necessitating extracorporeal life support rescue*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Favourable clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock due to fulminant myocarditis supported by percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenationEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Back from Irreversibility: Extracorporeal Life Support for Prolonged Cardiac ArrestThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Bridge to transplantation with the Jarvik-7 (CardioWest) total artificial heart: a single-center 15-year experienceThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2003
- The Equivalence of SF-36 Summary Health Scores Estimated Using Standard and Country-Specific Algorithms in 10 CountriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Quality of life in patients on chronic dialysis: Self-assessment 3 months after the start of treatmentPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failureIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Clinical Experience with a Total Artificial Heart as a Bridge for Transplantation: The Pitie ExperienceJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1995
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992