Cumulative prevalence of prostatism matches the autopsy prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Prostate
- Vol. 17 (3) , 241-246
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990170308
Abstract
The age-specific cumulative prevalence of clinically diagnosed prostatism among 1,057 generally healthy men followed for up to 30 years in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging was compared with the age-specific autopsy prevalence of pathologically defined benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from a published compilation of five independent autopsy studies involving 1,075 prostates. Clinical prevalences based on medical histories and digital rectal examinations showed excellent agreement with autopsy prevalences at all ages. Despite the well-known lack of correspondence between prostatism and objective urologic evidence of BPH in individual patients, these results suggest that the proportion of the male population with clinically recognizable prostatism by a given age is about the same as the proportion with pathological evidence of BPH.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symptoms and signs of prostatism as risk factors for prostatectomyThe Prostate, 1990
- Some Clinical Aspects of Uroflowmetry in Elderly Males:A Population SurveyScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1986
- The Development of Human Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with AgeJournal of Urology, 1984
- Natural History of Benign Prostatic HypertrophyPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- ProstatismScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1979
- The Significance of the Symptoms Associated with Bladder Outflow ObstructionUrologia Internationalis, 1978
- Are Doctors Able to Assess Prostatic Size?Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1978
- Morphogenesis of Nodular Hyperplasia—ProstateJournal of Urology, 1975
- Significance of Signs and Symptoms in Benign Prostatic HypertrophyBMJ, 1969
- Benign Hypertrophy of the Prostate. A Morphological StudyJournal of Urology, 1943