On the Heterogeneity of Leveraged Going Private Transactions
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 12 (2) , 281-309
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.2.281
Abstract
In contrast to previous literature, we argue that are two types of poorly performing firms going private through a leveraged buyout (LBO). One group consists of firms in which managers own an insignificant fraction of their firm's stock and are vulnerable to a hostile takeover. The other group consists of firms in which managers own a significant fraction of their firm's stock and so face little risk of hostile takeover. Our evidence indicates that there are two such groups of LBOs and that their motivations and posttransaction actions are different.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managerial incentives and the structure of management buyoutsJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998
- Differences between COMPUSTAT and CRSP SIC codes and related effects on researchJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1994
- The Role of Asset Structure, Ownership Structure, and Takeover Defenses in Determining Acquisition LikelihoodJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1992
- LEVERAGING THE UNDERINVESTMENT PROBLEM: HOW HIGH DEBT AND MANAGEMENT SHAREHOLDINGS SOLVE THE AGENCY COSTS OF FREE CASH FLOWJournal of Financial Research, 1992
- Corporate Investment Decisions and Corporate Control: Evidence from Going-Private TransactionsFinancial Management, 1992
- Ownership Structure, Leverage, and Firm Value: The Case of Leveraged RecapitalizationsFinancial Management, 1991
- A classification of mergers and acquisitions by motives: Analysis of market responses*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1989
- SICs as Delineators of Economic MarketsThe Journal of Business, 1989
- Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firmsJournal of Financial Economics, 1988
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983