Reliability of collecting colorectal cancer stage information from pathology reports and general practitioners in Queensland
Open Access
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 32 (4) , 378-382
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00259.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misclassification of colorectal cancer stage and area variation in survivalInternational Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Modes of presentation and pathways to diagnosis of colorectal cancer in QueenslandThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2007
- Collection of population-based cancer staging information in Western Australia – a feasibility studyPopulation Health Metrics, 2005
- Agreement Between Self-Reported Breast Cancer Treatment and Medical Records in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Family RegistryJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Survival differences between European and US patients with colorectal cancer: role of stage at diagnosis and surgeryGut, 2005
- Validity of breast cancer in the Danish Cancer Registry. A study based on clinical records from one county in DenmarkEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 2002
- Validity of Cancer Registry Data for Measuring the Quality of Breast Cancer CareJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Prognosis and response to therapy in colorectal cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution studyGut, 2000
- Validity of the stage of lung cancer in records of the Maastricht cancer registry, The NetherlandsLung Cancer, 1997