Reproducibility of LASIK flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 30 (5) , 1031-1037
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.09.070
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the actual versus the expected thickness of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps and to determine the factors that affect flap thickness. Setting: Centre For Sight, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, United Kingdom. Methods: A retrospective analysis of LASIK procedures in 757 consecutive eyes was done. The surgery was performed by a single surgeon using 2 Hansatome® microkeratomes (Bausch & Lomb) with 160 μm and 180 μm heads. Patient age, preoperative manifest refraction, automated keratometry, preoperative central pachymetry, and intraoperative stromal pachymetry were evaluated to determine whether they influenced the actual flap thickness. Results: Bilateral LASIK was performed in 343 patients (686 eyes). The 160 μm head was used in 641 eyes (84.6%) (Group 1) and the 180 μm head, in 116 eyes (15.4%) (Group 2). The mean preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) was −3.9 diopters (D) ± 4.5 (SD) (range +7.4 to −25.0 D) in Group 1 and −4.4 ± 3.7 D (range +7.1 to −12.9 D) in Group 2. The mean preoperative keratometry reading was 43.6 ± 1.8 D (range 36.0 to 48.6 D) and 43.6 ± 1.8 D (range 35.9 to 47.0 D), respectively; the mean preoperative central pachymetry was 543 ± 35 μm (range 447 to 643 μm) and 548 ± 31 μm (range 453 to 613 μm), respectively; and the mean flap thickness was 116.4 ± 19.8 μm and 117.3 ± 18.0 μm, respectively. The difference between the actual and the expected flap thickness in each group was statistically significant (P<.001). There was no significant difference in the actual flap thickness between the 2 Hansatomes. The preoperative SE and central pachymetry were the only factors that influenced the actual flap thickness (P<.05); thin flaps were more common with increasing myopia and increasing corneal thickness. Conclusions: Spherical equivalent and preoperative pachymetry were the principal factors that influenced flap thickness. Preoperative keratometry values and patient age did not influence the actual flap thickness.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- In vivo confocal microscopy through-focusing to measure corneal flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Summit Krumeich-Barraquer microkeratomeJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002
- The predictability of corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in laser in situ keratomileusisOphthalmology, 2000
- Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratomeJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2000
- Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatismOphthalmology, 2000
- Experimental evaluation of two current-generation automated microkeratomes: the Hansatome and the SupratomeAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Corneal flap dimensions in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Innovatome automatic microkeratomeKorean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2000
- Effect of resection velocity and suction ring on corneal flap formation in laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1999
- Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using an SCMD manual microkeratomeJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1999
- Experience during the learning curve of laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1996