The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The China Quarterly
- Vol. 144, 1132-1149
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000004768
Abstract
All states have a role in development, but this varies widely. The spectrum is defined at one end by thelaissez faireminimalist state whose role is limited to ensuring a stable and secure environment so that contracts, property rights and other institutions of the market can be honoured. At the opposite end are the centrally planned Leninist states that directly replace the market with bureaucratic allocation and planning. Between these two extremes are the capitalist developmental states of Japan and the East Asian Newly Industrializing Countries (NICs) that are neither Communist norlaissez faire, but exhibit characteristics of both. The state plays an activist, rather than a minimalist, role; there is planning, but it is geared toward creating maximum competitive and comparative advantage for manufacturers within a market economy.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- China, Corporatism, and the East Asian ModelThe Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 1995
- The Myths of the Market and the Common History of Late DevelopersPolitics & Society, 1993
- Why China's economic reforms differ: the M‐form hierarchy and entry/expansion of the non‐state sectorEconomics of Transition, 1993
- Reform from Below: The Private Economy and Local Politics in the Rural Industrialization of WenzhouThe China Quarterly, 1992
- Fiscal Reform and Local IndustrializationModern China, 1992
- HOW TO REFORM A PLANNED ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM CHINAOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1992
- Central–Local Relations in an Era of Fiscal Decline: The Paradox of Fiscal Decentralization in Post-Mao ChinaThe China Quarterly, 1991
- Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World stateSociological Forum, 1989
- The New Economics of OrganizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1984
- The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the FirmThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983