Effect of Instructions and Internal-External Control of Reinforcement on a Conditioned Finger-Withdrawal Response
- 1 April 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 26 (2) , 395-400
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1970.26.2.395
Abstract
The hypotheses that demand characteristics and personality affect the acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response were investigated. Ss were put into a buzzer-shock-finger withdrawal situation and then given Rotter's I-E scale. All Ss were told that they would receive a shock. Half of them were also instructed to avoid it. Significantly fewer of the uninstructed group learned the avoidance response. Of the instructed group, those Ss who acquired the response had higher I-E scores. External Ss made proportionately fewer CRs during acquisition and required more trials to extinction than the Internal Ss. The study suggests that human avoidance conditioning depends upon S's personality and the demand characteristics of the situation.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aversive conditioning: Learning or dissonance reduction?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968
- Generalization and awareness in verbal operant conditioning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967
- Effects of cue explication upon persons maintaining external control expectancies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967
- Effects of instructions on the extinction of a conditioned finger-withdrawal response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961
- Personality: An experimental approach.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1961