CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Suspiciousness of Nodules according to Size on Baseline Scans
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 231 (1) , 164-168
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2311030634
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the frequency with which a particular, possibly optimal work-up of noncalcified nodules less than 5.0 mm in diameter identified on initial computed tomographic (CT) images at baseline screening leads to a diagnosis of malignancy prior to first annual repeat screening, compared with a possibly optimal work-up of larger nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two series of baseline CT screenings in high-risk people were retrospectively reviewed. The first series (n = 1,000) was performed in 1993–1998; the second (n = 1,897), in 1999–2002. In each series, cases in which the largest noncalcified nodule detected was less than 5.0 mm in diameter and those in which it was 5.0–9 mm were reviewed to determine whether diagnostic work-up prior to first annual repeat screening showed or would have shown nodule growth and led or would have led to a diagnosis based on biopsy or surgical specimens. RESULTS: The frequency with which malignancy was or could have been diagnosed when the largest noncalcified nodu...Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lung Cancer Screening with CT: Mayo Clinic ExperienceRadiology, 2003
- CT Screening for Lung CancerAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Screening for Early Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 Asymptomatic SmokersRadiology, 2002
- Screening for lung cancer: the early lung cancer action approachLung Cancer, 2002
- Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screeningThe Lancet, 1999
- CommentJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Statistical control of counting experimentsBiometrika, 1952