Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopanereatography and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Vol. 9 (1) , 31-37
- https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1999.9.31
Abstract
Although experience with laparoscopic approaches to common duct stones is increasing, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed either before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the most common approach. Debate remains as to the best timing for ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Because clinical, laboratory, and radiological data are poor predictors of choledocholithiasis, many ERCPs done before LC give negative results. ERCP performed after LC with a positive intraoperative cholangiogram (i.o.p.) would eliminate many unnecessary preoperative endoscopic studies. This is a retrospective analysis of the treatment of choledocholithiasis with the combination of LC and ERCP. All patients included could have had ERCP preoperatively or postoperatively; therefore, those with cholangitis requiring emergent preoperative ERCP were excluded. Two groups of patients were compared: those who underwent ERCP followed by LC and those who underwent LC and IOC followed by ERCP. No significant differences were found with respect to age, gender, health status, clinical presentation, laboratory values (most liver functions, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, and serum amylase), surgery time, blood loss, ERCP time, time between treatment modalities, and days to regular diet. However, the preoperative ERCP group was found to have a longer hospital stay (6.7 days vs. 3.5 days, p = 0.003) and higher hospital cost ($9,406.39 vs. $12,816.23, p = 0.05). The preoperative ERCP group had two patients requiring two ERCPs to clear the common duct, one patient requiring conversion to open procedure because of failed LC, and four minor complications. The postoperative ERCP group had no failed LC, IOC, or postoperative ERCPs and one minor complication. The rate of false positive IOC was 6.7% and of negative preoperative ERCP, 43%. We conclude that in the absence of cholangitis requiring emergent endoscopic decompression, suspected choledocholithiasis can be successfully managed first with LC, ERCP being reserved for patients with a positive IOC. This eliminates many negative preoperative ERCPs.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selective use of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic cholecystectomyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- The Role of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Cholangiography in the Laparoscopic EraAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Increased ERCP Rate following the Introduction of Laparoscopic CholecystectomyJournal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, 1995
- Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in laparoscopic biliary surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Common Bile Duct Stones The Utility of Planned Perioperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography and SphincterotomyAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1993
- Early Treatment of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis by Endoscopic PapillotomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Endoscopic treatment of problems encountered after cholecystectomyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1993
- Choledocholithiasis Endoscopie Sphincterotomy or Common Bile Duct ExplorationAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensusGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991