The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement
Open Access
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Vol. 87-B (5) , 618-622
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b5.15390
Abstract
We have used the Oxford hip score to monitor the progress of 1908 primary and 279 revision hip replacements undertaken since the start of 1995. Our review programme began in early 1999 and has generated 3900 assessments.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty surgeryThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgeryQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2000
- Measurement of patient perceptions of pain and disability in relation to total hip replacement: the place of the Oxford hip score in mixed methodsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 1999
- Is revision as good as primary hip replacement?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1999
- The Problem of ‘Noise’ in Monitoring Patient-Based Outcomes: Generic, Disease-Specific and Site-Specific Instruments for Total Hip ReplacementJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1996
- Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1996
- QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1996
- Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or youngerThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994
- Survivorship analysis of 1,041 charnley total hip arthroplastiesThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1990