Differential diagnosis of depressive illness versus intense normal sadness: how significant is the ‘clinical significance criterion’ for major depression?
- 1 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
- Vol. 10 (7) , 1015-1018
- https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.10.67
Abstract
(2010). Differential diagnosis of depressive illness versus intense normal sadness: how significant is the ‘clinical significance criterion’ for major depression? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics: Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 1015-1018. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.67This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the DSM-IV Clinical Significance Criterion for Major Depression Reduce False Positives? Evidence From the National Comorbidity Survey ReplicationAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2010
- Diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in depressed multiple sclerosis patientsMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 2009
- How common are common mental disorders? Evidence that lifetime prevalence rates are doubled by prospectiveversusretrospective ascertainmentPsychological Medicine, 2009
- A longitudinal study on quality of life and depression in ALS patient–caregiver couplesNeurology, 2007
- Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey ReplicationArchives of General Psychiatry, 2005
- Perception of prognostic risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: the relationship with anxiety, depression, and disease-related distressJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Prevalence and impact of depression and pain in neurology outpatientsJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2003
- The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values.American Psychologist, 1992
- Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder.Psychological Review, 1992
- Depression as Viewed Through Neurologic SpectaclesPsychosomatics, 1968