Interpretive Biases for Ambiguous Information in Body Dysmorphic Disorder
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in CNS Spectrums
- Vol. 7 (6) , 435-443
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852900017946
Abstract
Anxiety-disordered patients and individuals with high trait anxiety tend to interpret ambiguous information as threatening. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether interpretive biases would also occur in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), which is characterized by a preoccupation with imagined defects in one's appearance. We tested whether BDD participants, compared with obsessive-compulsive disorder participants and healthy controls, would choose threatening interpretations for ambiguous body-related, ambiguous social, and general scenarios. As we hypothesized, BDD participants exhibited a negative interpretive bias for body-related scenarios and for social scenarios, whereas the other groups did not. Moreover, both clinical groups exhibited a negative interpretive bias for general scenarios.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxietyBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1999
- Negative interpretation bias in social phobiaBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1998
- Case Study: Body Dysmorphic Disorder in AdolescentsJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1995
- Body dysmorphic disorder: 30 cases of imagined uglinessAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1993
- Body Dysmorphic Disorder Diagnostic Issues and Related DisordersPsychosomatics, 1992
- Representations of the self in social phobia: Vulnerability to social threatCognitive Therapy and Research, 1990
- The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1989
- Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threatCognitive Therapy and Research, 1987
- Cognitive processes in anxietyAdvances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1983
- Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969