Ultrasound Training for Emergency Physicians— A Prospective Study
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 7 (9) , 1008-1014
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02092.x
Abstract
Bedside ultrasound examination by emergency physicians (EPs) is being integrated into clinical emergency practice, yet minimum training requirements have not been well defined or evaluated. This study evaluated the accuracy of EP ultrasonography following a 16-hour introductory ultrasound course. In phase I of the study, a condensed 16-hour emergency ultrasound curriculum based on Society for Academic Emergency Medicine guidelines was administered to emergency medicine houseofficers, attending staff, medical students, and physician assistants over two days. Lectures with syllabus material were used to cover the following ultrasound topics in eight hours: basic physics, pelvis, right upper quadrant, renal, aorta, trauma, and echo-cardiography. In addition, each student received eight hours of hands-on ultrasound instruction over the two-day period. All participants in this curriculum received a standardized pretest and posttest that included 24 emergency ultrasound images for interpretation. These images included positive, negative, and nondiagnostic scans in each of the above clinical categories. In phase II of the study, ultrasound examinations performed by postgraduate-year-2 (PGY2) houseofficers over a ten-month period were examined and the standardized test was readministered. In phase I, a total of 80 health professionals underwent standardized training and testing. The mean +/- SD pretest score was 15.6 +/- 4.2, 95% CI = 14. 7 to 16.5 (65% of a maximum score of 24), and the mean +/- SD posttest score was 20.2 +/- 1.6, 95% CI = 19.8 to 20.6 (84%) (p < 0. 05). In phase II, a total of 1,138 examinations were performed by 18 PGY2 houseofficers. Sensitivity was 92.4% (95% CI = 89% to 95%), specificity was 96.1% (95% CI = 94% to 98%), and overall accuracy was 94.6% (95% CI = 93% to 96%). The follow-up ultrasound written test showed continued good performance (20.7 +/- 1.2, 95% CI = 20.0 to 21.4). Emergency physicians can be taught focused ultrasonography with a high degree of accuracy, and a 16-hour course serves as a good introductory foundation.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bedside Emergency Department Ultrasonography plus Radiography of the Kidneys, Ureters, and Bladder vs Intravenous Pyelography in the Evaluation of Suspected Ureteral ColicAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1998
- Prevalence and structure of ultrasound curricula in emergency medicine residenciesThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1998
- APPLICATIONS FOR ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTEmergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 1997
- Outcome Analysis of a Protocol Including Bedside Endovaginal Sonography in Patients at Risk for Ectopic PregnancyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Prospective Analysis of a Rapid Trauma Ultrasound Examination Performed by Emergency PhysiciansThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- A prospective study of ultrasonography in the ED by emergency physiciansThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Model curriculum for physician training in emergency ultrasonographyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Emergency department echocardiography improves outcome in penetrating cardiac injuryAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Emergency department sonography by emergency physiciansThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Echocardiography performed by emergency physicians: Impact on diagnosis and therapyAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1988