Statistical issues in Studies of Individual Response
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 23 (sup147) , 40-45
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528809099158
Abstract
We consider intensive studies of individual response to therapy in a controlled experiment. It is helpful to distinguish between strict ‘N = 1’ studies, which are pragmatic trials intended to draw conclusions concerning only the patient under consideration, and ‘N=1’ studies, which are explanatory trials intended to make more general statements about a treatment with highly variable response, for which aggregate measures of effect on groups are inappropriate. Issues of design, measurement, and statistical significance are discussed, and the rule of permutation tests emphasised. Three published examples are used as illustrations.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining Optimal Therapy — Randomized Trials in Individual PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- SINGLE-PATIENT RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL Use in Determining Optimum Treatment for Patient with Inflammation of Kock Continent Ileostomy ReservoirThe Lancet, 1986
- The Effect of Cimetidine in Non-Ulcer DyspepsiaScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1985
- Statistics and Single Case AnalysisPublished by Elsevier ,1984