Clinical Risk Assessment After First Myocardial infarction—Is Additional Noninvasive Testing Necessary?
- 1 November 1992
- Vol. 102 (5) , 1499-1506
- https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.102.5.1499
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Future imperfect: The limitations of clinical prediction models and the limits of clinical predictionPublished by Elsevier ,2011
- First myocardial infarction: Age and ejection fraction identify a low-risk groupAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Risk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: Two-year follow-upThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Two Binomial ProportionsPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Accuracy of serial myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with thallium-201 for prediction of graft patency early and late after coronary artery bypass surgery. A controlled prospective study.Circulation, 1982
- Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Agreement in human interpretation of analog thallium myocardial perfusion images.Circulation, 1981
- Prognosis after initial myocardial infarction: The Framingham studyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction: a multivariate analysis of mortality and survival.Circulation, 1979