United Nations intervention and recurring conflict
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 50 (4) , 683-700
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300033555
Abstract
The end of the cold war has signaled a dramatic increase in the number and forms of United Nations (UN) intervention into ongoing conflicts. Yet, this larger UN role has not always translated into success. Short-term failures are evident, but the long-term effects of UN efforts are not readily apparent. We explore this longer-term impact by examining the incidence of recurring conflict between state dyads following a crisis. Overall, UN intervention has proved ineffective in inhibiting, delaying, or lessening the severity of future conflicts, independent of the level of violence in the precipitating crisis, the relative capabilities of the two states, the states' history of conflict, and the form of crisis outcome; nor were UN efforts successful in deterring future conflict. These sobering results suggest that changes in long-term strategy may be in order.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- One Thing Leads to Another: Recurrent Militarized Disputes in Latin America, 1816-1986Journal of Peace Research, 1994
- The empirical importance of enduring rivalriesInternational Interactions, 1992
- An Agenda for PeaceInternational Relations, 1992
- Empowering the United NationsForeign Affairs, 1992
- The limits of international organization: systematic failure in the management of international relationsInternational Organization, 1991
- When Peacekeeping Does Not Lead to Peace Some Notes on Conflict ResolutionBulletin of Peace Proposals, 1987
- Focus OnJournal of Peace Research, 1985
- Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- When Will They Ever Learn?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1983
- Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United NationsInternational Organization, 1966