Interpreting words in spatial descriptions
- 1 October 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes
- Vol. 3 (4) , 275-291
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968808402091
Abstract
A word may have the identical conventional meaning in different descriptions and yet be taken as denoting very different things. The proposal we tested is that the denotation of such a word is what the addressee believes it must be in order to contribute to the model of the situation that the speaker intended the addressee to create. We tested this proposal on the verb approach in descriptions schematised by “Figure F is just approaching landmark L for reason R.” The distance from F to L was judged to be larger, all else being equal, the larger the landmark, the larger the figure, the faster the figure was moving, and the farther away the figure could be and still fulfil his or her purpose. We argued that these and other results about word interpretation are best accounted for by listeners creating the intended situation models.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the process of comparing sentences against picturesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctionsMemory & Cognition, 1987
- IMPLICIT QUANTIFICATION OF TEMPORAL ADVERBIALSJournal of Semantics, 1985
- Prepositions and verb aspect in narrative understandingJournal of Memory and Language, 1985
- The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review, 1985
- When Nouns Surface as VerbsLanguage, 1979
- Measuring the visual angle of the mind's eyeCognitive Psychology, 1978
- A context-sensitive representation of word meaningsMemory & Cognition, 1976
- Semantic Theory and the Meaning of 'Good'The Journal of Philosophy, 1964
- Adverbs as multipliers.Psychological Review, 1959