Public versus private institutional performance reporting: What is mandatory for quality improvement?
- 22 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 152 (3) , 573-578
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.026
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Provider Profiling and Quality Improvement Efforts in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryMedical Care, 2003
- Statewide reporting of coronary artery surgery results: A view from CaliforniaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- Results of a regional study of modes of death associated with coronary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
- Assessing the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: How Many Risk Factors Are Enough?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: What do New York state cardiologists think of it?American Heart Journal, 1997
- Coronary Artery Bypass Mortality Rates in OntarioCirculation, 1996
- A Regional Intervention to Improve the Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryJAMA, 1996
- The Decline in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality in New York StatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- New York state's cardiac surgery reporting system: Four years laterThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
- A Regional Prospective Study of In-Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991