How Diagrams Can Improve Reasoning
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 4 (6) , 372-378
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00584.x
Abstract
We report an experimental study on the effects of diagrams on deductive reasoning with double disjunctions, for example: Raphael is in Tacoma or Julia is in Atlanta, or both. Julia is in Atlanta or Paul is in Philadelphia, or both. What follows? We confirmed that subjects find it difficult to deduce a valid conclusion, such as Julia is in Atlanta, or both Raphael is in Tacoma and Paul is in Philadelphia. In a preliminary study, the format of the premises was either verbal or diagrammatic, and the diagrams used icons to distinguish between inclusive and exclusive disjunctions. The diagrams had no effect on performance. In the main experiment, the diagrams made the alternative possibilities more explicit. The subjects responded faster (about 35 s) and drew many more valid conclusions (nearly 30%) from the diagrams than from the verbal premises. These results corroborate the theory of mental models and have implications for the role of diagrams in reasoning.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Propositional reasoning by model.Psychological Review, 1992
- The Case for Rules in ReasoningCognitive Science, 1992
- Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand WordsCognitive Science, 1987
- Some Empirical Justification for a Theory of Natural Propositional LogicPsychology of Learning and Motivation, 1984
- Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning.Psychological Review, 1983
- On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic.Psychological Review, 1978
- What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Hierarchies in concept attainment.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958