The Effectiveness of a Posted Information Package on the Beliefs and Behavior of Musculoskeletal Practitioners
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 35 (8) , 858-866
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181d4e04b
Abstract
Study Design. Randomized controlled trial. Objective. To investigate the effect of a printed information package on the low back pain (LBP)-related beliefs and reported behavior of musculoskeletal practitioners (chiropractors, osteopaths, and musculoskeletal physiotherapists) across the United Kingdom. Summary of Background Data. A substantial proportion of musculoskeletal practitioners in United Kingdom does not follow current LBP guideline recommendations. Methods. In total, 1758 practitioners were randomly allocated to either of the 2 study arms. One arm was posted a printed information package containing guideline recommendations for the management of LBP (n = 876) and the other received no intervention (n = 882). The primary outcome measure consisted of 3 "quality indicators" ( activity, work, and bed-rest) relating to a vignette of a patient with LBP, in which responses were dichotomized into either "guideline-inconsistent" or "guideline-consistent." The secondary outcome was the practitioners' LBP-related beliefs, measured using the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 6 months. Results. Follow-up at 6 months was 89%. The changes in reported behavior on the quality indicators were as follows: activity, odds ratio (OR) 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.61) and number needed to be treated (NNT), 19 (15-28); work, OR 1.35 (1.07-1.70) and NNT 19 (14-29); and bed-rest, OR 1.31 (0.97-1.76) and NNT 47 (33-103). The composite NNT for a change from guideline-inconsistent to guideline-consistent behavior on at least 1 of the 3 quality indicators was 10 (9-14). LBP-related beliefs were significantly improved in those who were sent the information package (P = 0.002), but only to a small degree (mean difference, 0.884 scale points; 95% confidence interval, 0.319-1.448). Conclusion. Printed educational material can shift LBP-related beliefs and reported behaviors of musculoskeletal practitioners, toward practice that is more in line with guideline recommendations.Keywords
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? A survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapistsPain, 2008
- Evidence-based care for low back pain in workers eligible for compensationOccupational Medicine, 2006
- Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary careBMJ, 2004
- Implementing clinical guidelines: Current evidence and future implicationsJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2004
- Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associationsManual Therapy, 2003
- Dutch Physiotherapy Guidelines for Low Back PainPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Physiotherapy Management of Low Back PainSpine, 2002
- Implementation Barriers for General Practice Guidelines on Low Back PainSpine, 2001
- Management of Nonspecific Low Back Pain by Physiotherapists in Britain and IrelandSpine, 1999
- Health Care Providersʼ Attitudes and Beliefs About Functinal Impairments And Chronic Back PainThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 1995