Effects of primary care coordination on public hospital patients
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 15 (5) , 329-336
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.07010.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of primary care coordination on utilization rates and satisfaction with care among public hospital patients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized gatekeeper intervention, with 1-year follow-up. SETTING: The Adult General Medical Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital, a university-affiliated public hospital. PATIENTS: We studied 2,293 established patients of 28 primary care physicians. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized based on their primary care physician’s main clinic day. The 1,121 patients in the intervention group (Ambulatory Patient-Physician Relationship Organized to Achieve Coordinated Healthcare [APPROACH] group) required primary care physician approval to receive specialty and emergency department (ED) services; 1,172 patients in the control group did not. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Changes in outpatient, ED, and inpatient utilization were measured for APPROACH and control groups over the 1-year observation period, and the differences in the changes between groups were calculated to estimate the effect of the intervention. Acceptability of the gatekeeping model was determined via patient satisfaction surveys. RESULTS: Over the 1-year observation period, APPROACH patients decreased their specialty use by 0.57 visits per year more than control patients did (P=.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.05 to −0.01). While APPROACH patients increased their primary care use by 0.27 visits per year more than control patients, this difference was not statistically significant (P=.14; 95% CI, −0.11 to 0.66). Changes in lowacuity ED care were similar between the two groups (0.06 visits per year more in APPROACH group than control group, P=.42; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.22). APPROACH patients decreased yearly hospitalizations by 0.14 visits per year more than control patients (P=.02; 95% CI, −0.26 to −0.03). Changes in patient satisfaction with care, perceived access to specialists, and use of out-of-network services between the 2 groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care model of health delivery in a public hospital that utilized a gatekeeping strategy decreased outpatient specialty and hospitalization rates and was acceptable to patients.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physician Payment Policies: Impacts and ImplicationsAnnual Review of Public Health, 1997
- Evaluation of Medicaid Managed CarePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Does Increased Access to Primary Care Reduce Hospital Readmissions?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Trends: Medicaid: Moving To Managed CareHealth Affairs, 1996
- Managed Care and Capitation in California: How Do Physicians at Financial Risk Control Their Own Utilization?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Access of Medicaid Recipients to Outpatient CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- How Do Financial Incentives Affect Physicians' Clinical Decisions and the Financial Performance of Health Maintenance Organizations?New England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- An Evaluation of Utah??s Primary Care Case Management Program for Medicaid RecipientsMedical Care, 1988
- A Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Prepaid Group Practice on Use of ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984