GENETIC VARIABILITY AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF DINOPHYSIS SPECIES (DINOPHYCEAE) FROM NORWEGIAN WATERS INFERRED FROM SINGLE CELL ANALYSES OF rDNA1
- 28 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Phycology
- Vol. 39 (2) , 395-408
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.01252.x
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine rDNA sequences of the most common Dinophysis species in Scandinavian waters and to resolve their phylogenetic relationships within the genus and to other dinoflagellates. A third aim was to examine the intraspecific variation in D. acuminata and D. norvegica, because these two species are highly variable in both morphology and toxicity. We obtained nucleotide sequences of coding (small subunit [SSU], partial large subunit [LSU], 5.8S) and noncoding (internal transcribed spacer [ITS]1, ITS2) parts of the rRNA operon by PCR amplification of one or two Dinophysis cells isolated from natural water samples. The three photosynthetic species D. acuminata, D. acuta, and D. norvegica differed in only 5 to 8 of 1802 base pairs (bp) within the SSU rRNA gene. The nonphotosynthetic D. rotundata (synonym Phalacroma rotundatum[Claparède et Lachmann] Kofoid et Michener), however, differed in approximately 55 bp compared with the three photosynthetic species. In the D1 and D2 domains of LSU rDNA, the phototrophic species differed among themselves by 3 to 12 of 733 bp, whereas they differed from D. rotundata by more than 100 bp. This supports the distinction between Dinophysis and Phalacroma. In the phylogenetic analyses based on SSU rDNA, all Dinophysis species were grouped into a common clade in which D. rotundata diverged first. The results indicate an early divergence of Dinophysis within the Dinophyta. The LSU phylogenetic analyses, including 4 new and 11 Dinophysis sequences from EMBL, identified two major clades within the phototrophic species. Little or no intraspecific genetic variation was found in the ITS1–ITS2 region of single cells of D. norvegica and D. acuminata from Norway, but the delineation between these two species was not always clear.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic Diversity and Molecular Detection of Three Toxic Dinoflagellate Genera and from French CoastsProtist, 2002
- Relationship between occurrence of Dinophysis species (Dinophyceae) and shellfish toxicityPhycologia, 2001
- Phylogeny of some of the major genera of dinoflagellates based on ultrastructure and partial LSU rDNA sequence data, including the erection of three new genera of unarmoured dinoflagellatesPhycologia, 2000
- Toxicity and ribosomal DNA of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis sacculus (Dinophyta)Phycologia, 2000
- Comparative study ofGymnodinium mikimotoiandGymnodinium aureolum, comb. nov. (=Gyrodinium aureolum) based on morphology, pigment composition, and molecular dataJournal of Phycology, 2000
- Database on the structure of large ribosomal subunit RNANucleic Acids Research, 1998
- THE PHYLOGENY OF PLASTIDS: A REVIEW BASED ON COMPARISONS OF SMALL‐SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL RNA CODING REGIONSJournal of Phycology, 1995
- The marine dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis (Dinophyceae): photosynthetic, neritic and non-photosynthetic, oceanic speciesPhycologia, 1988
- The small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences from the hypotrichous ciliates Oxytricha nova and Stylonychia pustulata.Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1985
- Some NorwegianDinophysisspecies (Dinoflagellata)Sarsia, 1976