Interviewer feedback in repeated interviews involving forced confabulation
- 11 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Vol. 21 (4) , 433-455
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1286
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explain this: explaining childhood events inflates confidence for those eventsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2004
- Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2003
- Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998
- Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1996
- Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence.Law and Human Behavior, 1996
- Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Mock-juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension.Law and Human Behavior, 1989