Characterization of muscarinic receptors in dog tracheal smooth muscle cells
- 1 February 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Autonomic Pharmacology
- Vol. 11 (1) , 51-61
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-8673.1991.tb00244.x
Abstract
1. The tritiated muscarinic antagonist N-methyl scopolamine, [3H]-NMS, was used to characterize the muscarinic receptors associated with the intact dog tracheal smooth muscle cells. Based on receptor binding assays, the intact tracheal smooth muscle cells had specific, saturable, high-affinity binding sites for [3H]-NMS. 2. Specific binding was cell concentration- and time-dependent. The specific binding of [3H]-NMS was increased linearly with increasing cell concentrations. The equilibrium for association of [3H]-NMS with the muscarinic receptors was attained within 30 min at 37 degrees C. 3. Binding was saturable with respect to [3H]-NMS concentrations. Analysis of binding isotherms yielded an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) of 320 +/- 20 pM and a maximum receptor density (Bmax) of 13.7 +/- 1.4 fmole per 5 x 10(4) cells. The Hill coefficient for [3H]-NMS binding was 1.00 +/- 0.01. The association (K1) and dissociation (K-1) rate constants were determined to be (1.19 +/- 0.23) x 10(8) M-1 min-1 and 0.034 +/- 0.09 min-1, respectively. KD, calculated from the ratio of K-1 and K1, was 286 +/- 65 pM; this value is close to the value of KD calculated from Scatchard plots of binding isotherms. 4. The non-selective muscarinic antagonist atropine and M1 selective antagonist pirenzepine did not reveal any selectivity of these muscarinic receptors. Pirenzepine competed with [3H]-NMS for a single binding site with a Ki value of (6.02 +/- 0.69) x 10(-7) M which is close to the value of M2 or M3 receptors, indicating that the M1 receptor subtype did not exist in the intact tracheal smooth muscle cells. 5. Competition with cardioselective antagonist (M2), methoctramine; smooth muscle selective antagonists (M3), hexahydrodifenidol and hexahydrosiladifenidol; as well as carbachol, were best fit by a two-binding site model. The results suggest that both M2 and M3 receptor subtypes exist at the cell surface of tracheal smooth muscle cells.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversityTrends in Neurosciences, 1989
- Identification of a Family of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor GenesScience, 1987
- A further search for selective antagonists at M2‐muscarinic receptorsBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1986
- Cardioselective profile of AF-DX 116, a muscarine M2 receptor antagonistLife Sciences, 1986
- Identification and Characterization of Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptors in the Isolated Plasma Membranes and Intact Tissue of the Urinary BladderJournal of Receptor Research, 1986
- Action of agonists and antagonists at muscarinic receptors present on ileum and atria in vitroBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1985
- Comparison of the affinity constant of some muscarinic receptor antagonists with their displacement of [3 H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding in atrial and ileal longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pigJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1985
- Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptorsNature, 1980
- A COMPARISON OF AFFINITY CONSTANTS FOR MUSCARINE‐SENSITIVE ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS IN GUINEA‐PIG ATRIAL PACEMAKER CELLS AT 29°C AND IN ILEUM AT 29°C AND 37°CBritish Journal of Pharmacology, 1976
- Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reactionBiochemical Pharmacology, 1973