An analysis of the effects of thermal demagnetization on magnetic carriers
- 1 May 1988
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 15 (5) , 487-490
- https://doi.org/10.1029/gl015i005p00487
Abstract
We have attempted to determine why samples of the Mio‐Pliocene Purisima Formation are not amenable to thermal demagnetization. Analyses of the changes in direction, intensity, susceptibility, color, and saturation magnetization as well as examination of individual magnetic grains using a scanning electron microscope have all contributed to the development of a consistent hypothesis for the fate of iron during thermal demagnetization. In this particular case, we believe that oxidation‐exsolution of ilmenite and then direct dissolution of nearly pure magnetite result from progressively higher heating levels. Our approach should be useful in understanding the origin and nature of the magnetization of many lithologies, including those for which thermal demagnetization is the method of choice.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paleomagnetism of Upper Devonian reefal limestones, Canning basin, Western AustraliaGSA Bulletin, 1987
- Magnetostratigraphy of the late Neogene purisima formation, Santa Cruz County, CaliforniaEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1986
- On the use of Zijderveld vector diagrams in multicomponent paleomagnetic studiesPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1979
- Removal of secondary magnetization from natural remanent magnetization of sedimentary rocks: Alternating field or thermal demagnetization technique?Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1976
- Magnetic Mineralogy of Unheated and Heated Red Sediments by Coercivity Spectrum AnalysisGeophysical Journal International, 1972