Visual versus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses: Can the angiographer's eye be reeducated?

This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:

• Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991
• Coronary artery revascularization. Critical need for, and consequences of, objective angiographic assessment of lesion severity.
  Circulation, 1990
• Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms; Implications for clinical decisions
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
• Identifying and measuring severity of coronary artery stenosis. Quantitative coronary arteriography and positron emission tomography.
  Circulation, 1988
• Assessment, of coronary angioplasty: Comparison of visual assessment, hand‐held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation
  Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1988
• Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
• Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: Diameter versus densitometric area measurements
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
• Does Visual Interpretation of the Coronary Arteriogram Predict the Physiologic Importance of a Coronary Stenosis?
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
• A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: Comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements
  The American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
• Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms.
  Circulation, 1977