Experimental modification of the dominance relations of a melanotic tumour gene inDrosophila melanogaster
- 1 August 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Genetics Research
- Vol. 20 (1) , 115-135
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300013628
Abstract
SUMMARY: The melanotic tumour genetu-C4inDrosophila melanogastershows incomplete dominance, together with variable penetrance and expressivity. It is tentatively located in the region of locus 52–53 on the third chromosome. Tumour formation in mutant homozygotes involves a precocious haemocyte transformation leading to the appearance of lamellocytes at the beginning of the third larval instar. These aggregate to form tumour-like masses which subsequently melanize. The process of tumour formation is in broad outline similar to that found in other tumour strains. Melanotic tumour formation is treated as a dichotomous threshold character, assuming an underlying normal distribution of liability relative to a fixed threshold. The expression of the tumour gene can be influenced by the levels of protein, phospholipid, nucleic acid and carbohydrate in the larval food medium, and changes in dominance and penetrance induced by sub-optimal environments deficient in these nutrients are positively correlated. Reinforcement by selection of the dominance relations oftu-C4was accompanied by correlated changes in penetrance. Conversely, selection for increased penetrance was accompanied by correlated changes in dominance. Dominance and penetrance, it is concluded, are fundamentally related aspects of tumour gene expression. Recruitment of dominance modifiers linked to the tumour gene was excluded by the mating scheme employed, and the observed changes in dominance relations in response to selection were due largely to modifiers located on the second chromosome. Changes in dominance relations produced by selection could be significantly reinforced, or reversed, by environmental factors and consequently show a substantial genotype – environment interaction effect. These facts are relevant to current theories of dominance evolution.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetical control of penetrance and evolution of dominance in DrosophilaHeredity, 1968
- Neoplasms of InsectsAnnual Review of Entomology, 1968
- The evolution and nature of dominanceJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1963
- The evolution of dominance under disruptive selectionHeredity, 1960
- Tumor formationin relation to metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogasterJournal of Morphology, 1957
- Alterations in the haemocyte population of Drosophila melanogasterJournal of Morphology, 1957
- THE EXPERIMENTAL MODIFICATION OF DOMINANCE IN DANFORTH'S SHORT‐TAILED MUTANT MICEAnnals of Eugenics, 1943
- The reletion between nutrition and exhibition of the gene antennales (Drosophila melanogaster)Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1941
- A Note on Fisher's Theory of the Origin of Dominance, and on a Correlation between Dominance and LinkageThe American Naturalist, 1930
- The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent MutationsThe American Naturalist, 1928