Enriching the Doctor-Patient Relationship by Inviting the Patient's Perspective
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 116 (5) , 414-418
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-414
Abstract
Doctors and patients alike are saddened and angered by the distance that increasingly interferes with their interactions. Two complementary strategies may enhance the human quality of clinical care and improve outcomes. First, the doctor and patient can undertake a systematic "patient's review" that addresses seven dimensions of care: 1) respect for patient's values, preferences, and expressed needs; 2) communication and education; 3) coordination and integration of care; 4) physical comfort; 5) emotional support and alleviation of fears and anxieties; 6) involvement of family and friends; and 7) continuity and transition. Incorporating the "review" into the clinical encounter encourages both patient and doctor to confront individual preferences and values and offers patients an explicit framework for participating actively in their care. Second, using survey instruments designed to solicit focused reports from patients that address each dimension of care, doctors can gather aggregate feedback about their practices. Such reports move beyond anecdote and can serve as screening tests that uncover areas in doctors' practices that merit improvement. In addition, patients can join doctors in developing solutions to problems uncovered by patients' reports.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2. Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality A TaxonomyMedical Care, 1990
- The End Results of Health Care: Ernest Codman's Contribution to Quality Assessment and BeyondThe Milbank Quarterly, 1989
- The Cost-effectiveness of Intensive Postdischarge CareMedical Care, 1988
- Family intervention after stroke: does counseling or education help?Stroke, 1988
- A Review of Systems for the Personal Aspects of Patient Care**Supported in part by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Grant #6309 and a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The opinions, conclusions, and proposals in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of either Foundation.The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1988
- Patient Exposition and Physician Explanation in Initial Medical Interviews and Outcomes of Clinic VisitsMedical Care, 1985
- Consumer Values and Subsequent Satisfaction Ratings of Physician BehaviorMedical Care, 1984
- Choices about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Evaluation of Operational Failures in Clinical Decision MakingMedical Decision Making, 1983
- Authority and Decision-Making in a Hospital: A Comparative AnalysisAmerican Sociological Review, 1958