Intersectionality as buzzword
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Feminist Theory
- Vol. 9 (1) , 67-85
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
Abstract
Since its inception, the concept of `intersectionality' — the interaction of multiple identities and experiences of exclusion and subordination — has been heralded as one of the most important contributions to feminist scholarship. Despite its popularity, there has been considerable confusion concerning what the concept actually means and how it can or should be applied in feminist inquiry. In this article, I look at the phenomenon of intersectionality's spectacular success within contemporary feminist scholarship, as well as the uncertainties and confusion which it has generated. Drawing upon insights from the sociology of science, I shall show how and why intersectionality could become a feminist success story. I shall argue that, paradoxically, it is precisely the concept's alleged weaknesses — its ambiguity and open-endedness — that were the secrets to its success and, more generally, make it a good feminist theory.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘I Am the Ultimate Challenge’European Journal of Women's Studies, 2006
- From difference to intersectionality: challenges and resourcesEuropean Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 2003
- Politics Out of HistoryPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,2001
- Rethinking Social Divisions: Some Notes towards a Theoretical FrameworkSociological Review, 1998
- Toward a feminist rhetoric: The Gilligan debate revisitedWomen's Studies International Forum, 1992
- IntroductionPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of ColorStanford Law Review, 1991
- Contextualizing Feminism — Gender, Ethnic and Class DivisionsFeminist Review, 1983
- The Reproduction of MotheringPublished by University of California Press ,1978
- That's Interesting!Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1971