Developmental and Sex Differences in Occupational Preferences
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 106 (2) , 267-272
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1978.9924178
Abstract
The present study (N = 479 students) investigated children's preferences in regard to four traditionally female occupations and four traditionally male occupations. Each pair of jobs was selected to represent four different levels of status: i.e., professional, skilled, semiskilled, and unskilled labor. Results were as predicted. Over four age groups from fifth grade through college, boys and girls became less stereotypic in their occupational preferences. Apparently, once children become aware that jobs of higher status level offer more rewards in terms of money and prestige, they will choose a higher status nontraditional job, rather than a lower status traditional job. This appears to be more true for females than for males.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social class and sex-stereotyping of occupationsJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1976
- Attitudes in four age groups toward sex role division in adult occupations and activitiesJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1975
- Career development of youth: a nationwide studyThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1974
- Sex Differences in Adolescent Vocational PreferencesVocational Guidance Quarterly, 1973
- Adolescents' views of women's work role.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1972
- Sex differences in the expression of vocational aspirations by elementary school children.Developmental Psychology, 1971
- Sociological Theory and Occupational ChoiceSociological Review, 1967
- Influence of Sex and Social Class on Occupational Preference and PerceptionThe Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1967
- Knowledge and Interests Concerning Sixteen Occupations Among Elementary and Secondary School StudentsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1963
- Occupational Choice: A Conceptual FrameworkILR Review, 1956